My name is Apryl and I am a Research Technician at the University of New Hampshire and a Graduate Student. My student work is focused on extracting ebullition events (methane bubble events) from a temperate wetland via acoustic data in an effort to better understand how this transport pathway is contributing to the global methane budget. The other projects I work with look at CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes from wetland and terrestrial systems. We are interested in how climate and land use change affects the emission of trace gases from these systems to the atmosphere.
The strongest part of your project was in the details. Your methods and subsequent limitations and conclusions were clear and concise.
Have you given any thought as to why the Sugar Maple on 17-Jul showed only ~4 C difference vs the other days where the differences ranaged from ~10 - 14 C? It also seems that the Silver Maple on 22-Jul also had a relatively low temperature difference in relation to the other days.
Perhaps include the common name of your trees in the figures included in your report as well as both the common and scientific names for the ones in your poster. It makes it easier to follow the discussion for people who may not be familiar with scientific names. Don't forget to include y-axis labels and units
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6e3a/d6e3a6e318251abadc6bda7d90d29e641cb92a8f" alt="emoticon"
I think it would be interesting to see how your results may (or may not) change with the additon of more sample units. Also, I wonder how the results may shift along an urbanization gradient. Perhaps including a forest or park as a reference site as well as larger and/or smaller cities.
I really enjoyed reading about your project and think you both did a great job!