GLOBE Scientists' Blog

Next week, The GLOBE Program expects to see 250 members of the GLOBE community in attendance at the 17^th Annual GLOBE Partner Meeting. GLOBE partners, scientists, teachers, students, and other community members from 27 countries will travel to Maryland for the weeklong meeting.

Figure 1. GLOBE Partners from across the United States meeting together at a past GLOBE Annual Meeting.

The excitement leading up to a conference like the GLOBE Annual Meeting reminds me of my first scientific conference that I attended when I was an undergraduate student. I can only imagine how the 63 GLOBE students that will attend the Annual Meeting next week must feel!

I remember how overwhelmed I felt by the number of talks one could attend and the number of people speeding up and down the halls trying to make it to as many of their selected talks as possible.  Beyond the scientific presentations of that particular meteorology conference, I was also amazed to see the vast number of organizations represented in the conference exhibit hall.  From private instrument manufacturing companies to big name national research labs to contractors, I realized my understanding of the careers and opportunities in the world of meteorology was only in its infancy.

Luckily, I went to this meeting accompanied by other students from my school, a few with more conference and professional experience to show me the ropes.  As we walked around the exhibit hall, one of my colleagues seemed to know everyone! People greeted her as we passed, and many stopped to talk to her. The networking connections I saw her engage with that day even helped me get started on my career path.

Because I recognized that summer research internships were a very important way to get vital experience for joining the scientific workforce, my ambition for the following summer was to do a research internship.  I had my sights set on participating in a certain premier summer research experience, which was at a school very well known for severe storms research (exactly what I was interested in). I was also sure I wanted to attend this institution for graduate school.  Even so, my well-connected colleague encouraged me to seek out a few other opportunities for a summer research experience and graduate school, and even helped me navigate around the booths in the exhibit hall to gather pamphlets about each.  After the conference, I applied to all of the programs I found that week, plus to the one I had my heart set on.

This networking experience led my career path in a completely different direction from what I originally thought it would be, since I ended up choosing to participate in a different summer research experience and I attended one of her suggested graduate schools.  I am very happy with my choices, which I feel have broadened my horizons much beyond where I would be if I had stuck to my original plan.

Almost 15 years from that fateful conference, I am now a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research and hold a split appointment as a scientist with The GLOBE Program.  My fairly unique split appointment is yet another example of the power of networking.  As I started my scientific research career after obtaining my Ph.D. in Atmospheric Science, I discussed my interests with many colleagues until finally I made the connection that gave me this opportunity to pursue my interests in both scientific research as well as science education.

Figure 2. GLOBE Science and Education Team staff, including myself, with a GLOBE teacher at the American Meteorological Society conference exhibit hall.

I am grateful for having many connections with people in my field and believe that similar networking opportunities, such as the GLOBE Annual Meeting and networks like the GLOBE International Scientist Network (GISN), can help scientists, educators, and students in the GLOBE community connect and contribute to the vision of GLOBE.

So whether you are a GLOBE student, scientist, teacher, or community member, and whether you are attending next week’s GLOBE Annual Meeting or another conference down the road, keep in mind the benefits that networking with your colleagues can have on your career.  And also remember that there are plenty of young me’s out there in need of the eye-opening guidance that networking can provide.

Figure 3. GLOBE scientists, trainers, and student alumni at a past GLOBE Annual Meeting.

Traveling to the GLOBE Annual Meeting next week? Upload your “I do GLOBE” video here. 

Are you a scientist interested in working with students?  Join the GLOBE International Scientist Network (GISN)!  For more information on how to join the GISN, click here.

This week’s blog post is a cross-post from the SmartBlog on Education, discussing Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and gap analysis.  Various GLOBE Partners, such as Dave Bydlowski and Marcy Seavey, have been very active in the NGSS and suggested this blog post to us to share with our community.  This blog was originally posted on http://smartblogs.com/education/2013/06/26/ngss-curriculum-development-from-gaps-to-great/ and was written by Fred Ende and Adam Percival.

Now that the Next Generation Science Standards have been released and many states are considering adoption, a question that many science educators are pondering is: “How can I tell whether resources are aligned to the new standards?”

Let’s look at how we might begin to answer that question. Suppose we had this fifth-grade performance expectation (PE):

5-ESS2-2. Describe and graph the amounts and percentages of water and fresh water in various reservoirs to provide evidence about the distribution of water on Earth.

A first step might be to check whether students have the opportunity to meet this expectation in the current curriculum through a series of learning investigations that asks students to use information about the different reservoirs of water on Earth — oceans, lakes, ice caps, etc. — and make a graph from it. A gap analysis describing the alignment of the curriculum to each standard is one way to accomplish this.

Sample gap analysis created for fifth-grade curriculum. Image created by Fred Ende.

However, educators must remember that identifying gaps such as in the above example is only a first step. The Next Generation Science Standards are performance expectations for assessments (both statewide and at the classroom level), and not a curriculum. So, while pre-existing learning investigations may be an acceptable way to meet this PE, they are also not the only way to address it. From here, educators need to think about whether alignment is simply massaging current curriculum to fit PEs, or whether a gap analysis provides for some truly innovative opportunities. For example, it would also be possible to craft a project-based unit on the water cycle, perhaps including an investigation of local waterways, constructing models of the local watershed, and embedding an engineering project to create a device to improve water quality. This big picture approach moves from a standard gap analysis to an integrated design where the foundations of the NGSS can truly be seen in action. In fact, this sample unit could be used to address both the standard above and three others in fifth grade:

5-ESS2-1. Develop a model using an example to describe ways the geosphere, biosphere, hydrosphere, and/or atmosphere interact.

5-ESS3-1. Obtain and combine information about ways individual communities use science ideas to protect the Earth’s resources and environment.

3-5-ETS1-1. Define a simple design problem reflecting a need or a want that includes specified criteria for success and constraints on materials, time, or cost.

Units such as these not only ensure that required disciplinary core ideas are “covered” at the appropriate level, but also address many other important considerations, such as directly engaging students in scientific and engineering practices, and assisting students (and teachers) in seeing the disciplinary (and interdisciplinary) connections the cross-cutting concepts provide. This is where the original graphing activity starts to fall short, because in isolation it might meet the “letter” of the practice “Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking” but it doesn’t quite attain the “spirit” of having students engage in multiple practices in an authentic context, as scientists and engineers do. In fact, under our revised unit design, the graphing activity might actually become a performance-based assessment task at the end of the unit (or a formative measure during the unit) rather than an activity designed to teach the material to be learned.

This distinction between curriculum and assessment is very important, because it means that to determine alignment in many cases we need to look at the vision of the NGSS, including use of the three dimensions — Disciplinary Core Ideas, Cross-Cutting Concepts, and Scientific and Engineering Practices –, integration with the common core ELA and math standards, and a focus on depth of coverage over breadth. At this year’s National Science Teachers Association conference in San Antonio, Ted Willard from NSTA shared an ongoing project to create rubrics for the NGSS similar to the tri-state rubrics for Common Core alignment. Rubrics such as these which take into account multiple factors are one method of avoiding an overly narrow focus on alignment to the letter rather than the enduring purpose of the NGSS.

In conclusion, alignment to the Next Generation Science Standards is a complex topic, and will likely mean very different things to different people. However, alignment must mean more than just “checking boxes” or a simple “crosswalk” from old standards to new. After analyzing existing resources using techniques such as a gap analysis, educators need to think long and hard about whether the curriculum truly meets the intentions of the K-12 Framework for Science Education and NGSS, and what alterations would be needed if it does not.

Suggested Activity: Join Dave, Marcy and the GLOBE Program Office for a webinar on Thursday, 18 July at 17:00 UTC (1 pm EDT/12 pm CDT/11 am MDT/10 am PDT).  This webinar marks the first in a series of aligning the GLOBE Program with Next Generation Science Standards.  Find out more information on the webinar here.